Friday, March 29, 2019

Cramer: I'm skeptical about Lyft as a longer-term investment

Lyft, the ridesharing company set to hit public markets Friday, will be a good stock to buy in the short term but it has challenges in the long run, CNBC's Jim Cramer said Friday.

"I think Lyft is exactly the kind of stock that can work in this slower growth environment, but you need to be careful with these fresh-faced IPOs," the "Mad Money" host said. "Short term, I'm betting this turns out to be a good trade, but as a longer-term investment I'm more skeptical."

In evaluating the tech company, Cramer highlighted pros and cons about Lyft as it looks to continue taking market share in the growing transportation-as-a-service business. He predicted the company will be worth $21.5 billion and the stock could sell between 3.8 to 4.8 times next year's sales.

"I think the stock can go to $75 before it starts getting expensive relative to its peers, but for all we know it will go to $75 immediately after it starts trading. After that, I think you need to get more cautious."

Lyft is a great growth story, the host said. After launching in San Francisco in 2012, it has expanded to more than 300 markets across the country and Canada. With 18.6 million active users as of December, 1.1 million drivers, and 39 percent market share, it practically has a duopoly with Uber, he said.

The company has a good balance sheet because it has no problem raising money, but it spent $1 billion in 2018 and plans to top that figure in 2019, Cramer noted. Although its gross margins improved from 18 percent in 2016 to 42.3 percent last year, Lyft has a ways to go before it is profitable because it is spending to expand and take market share, he added.

"The biggest concern here is that Lyft lost nearly a billion dollars last year and we have no idea when it will become profitable," Cramer said. "Yesterday the company held a major investor meeting where they indicated that 2019 will be a peak year for investing in the business ... The problem here is that if anything starts to go off the rails, there's nothing propping up the stock."

Lyft's bookings growth has also slowed from 140 percent in 2017 to 75 percent in 2018, Cramer said. The good news is its revenue as a percentage of bookings has continued increasing 18 to 27 percent in the past two years, meaning the company is making more money per ride. But the company could miss user expectations as bookings ease, similarly to the active users on Snapchat, the picture and video app owned by Snap Inc., Cramer said.

Additionally, the transportation sector is highly regulated, especially at the local and state levels where disruptive tech companies don't get much love from politicians, Cramer said. He also criticized its dual-class ownership structure, which gives nearly half of the voting power to its founders: CEO Logan Green and Vice Chairman John Zimmer.

"When shareholders don't have the ability to remove management, you can end up with some perverse incentives," the host said. "This is something else Lyft has in common with Snap, and it's pretty suboptimal."

Questions for Cramer?
Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC

Want to take a deep dive into Cramer's world? Hit him up!
Mad Money Twitter - Jim Cramer Twitter - Facebook - Instagram

Questions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? madcap@cnbc.com

Thursday, March 28, 2019

FedEx Earnings Signal a Changing World

FedEx (NYSE:FDX) stock is on the investing menu today as the “disaster of the day” and it could take the whole market down with it. The shares are off almost $10 today, or over 5%, after announcing disappointing third-quarter results.

FDX: FedEx Earnings Signal a Changing WorldFDX: FedEx Earnings Signal a Changing WorldThe Memphis-based delivery company said it earned $739 million, $2.80 per share, on revenues of $17 billion, against earnings of $2.07 billion, $7.59 per share, and revenue of $16.5 billion a year ago.

CEO Frederick Smith didn’t try to sugarcoat it, calling the numbers “below our expectations.” He promised new investments to lower costs and return to earnings growth.

Analysts, however, were left scratching their heads. CNN blamed the Trump trade wars, quoting CFO Alan Graf about FedEx Express’ lower international revenue.

But there could be another explanation.

Growing Competition for FedEx Stock?

I’m a regular customer of Amazon.Com (NASDAQ:AMZN). So are many neighbors. In years past, I got packages from a mix of U.S. Postal Service employees (especially on Sunday), UPS (NYSE:UPS) trucks and FedEx, I’m now seeing white Amazon trucks every day. During the recent Super Bowl in Atlanta, Amazon offered a subtle reminder of this. It brought out a fleet of dark blue vans for delivery. After the game they went back to the plain white ones.

FedEx is also facing more competition from UPS, its long-time rival. Over the last year UPS stock is up while FDX has lost 28% of its value.

Smith himself said he saw “green sprouts” in the international market, although CNBC called the earnings a warning that global growth is slowing.

A closer look at the numbers showed a more complex picture.

Costs at FedEx Ground were up as the company launched six-day-a-week service and saw higher gas prices. FedEx International revenues were down, in part, due to weaker international currencies. Global profits were down on lower shipment weights and a customer preference for lower-profit services. Graf said the company is taking the usual responses to slowing business, buying out some employees, limiting hiring, and looking at other cost-cutting measures.


Compare Brokers
FDX Stock a Bargain?

Investors should be playing FedEx stock for its dividend, not capital gains. Over the last five years, that quarterly dividend has more than tripled, to 65 cents. Even with the latest miss, it’s still covered four times by earnings.

If you bought FedEx shares five years ago, when they were at about $135 each, you’re currently seeing a yield of 5.2% on that investment, dividing the annual dividend of $2.60 per share by its March 20 opening price. The stock’s trailing price-to-earnings multiple stands at just 9.4. The company’s market cap of $45 billion is around two-thirds of its expected 2019 revenue of $68 billion.

By these conventional measures FedEx is a bargain. It’s good for the dividend, even with earnings depressed. The company is still forecasting earnings of over $15 per year, with capital spending of $5.6 billion. Those forecasts assume steady U.S. growth and no further international slowdown.

The Bottom Line

When you are buying dividend stocks for retirement, you look for those covering their dividends with earnings and you buy on weakness, when the yield is highest. FedEx has offered a steady stream of dividends since 2002, and they were not even cut during the last recession.

For these investors, FedEx’s depressed price today is a real bargain.

For younger investors seeking fat capital gains, however, you might want to look elsewhere.

Dana Blankenhorn is a financial and technology journalist. He is the author of a new mystery thriller, The Reluctant Detective Finds Her Family, available now at the Amazon Kindle store. Write him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter at @danablankenhorn. As of this writing he own

Monday, March 18, 2019

Investors should be 'kicking the tires' on these undervalued stocks

Activision Blizzard and Spotify were among the stocks Wall Street analysts recommended to clients as undervalued this week.

CNBC combed through company research to find analysts discussing buying opportunities for stocks. Other names cited as possible values include: Newell Brands, Dollar General, Marvell, and Anthem

Activision "is down nearly 50% in the past six months and we believe investors should be 'kicking the tires,' given an improving setup in late '19 and 2020," Piper Jaffray analyst Michael Olson said.

Last month, on the heels of the wildly successful Epic Games' 'Fortnite', Activision issued a weak forecast and announced it was cutting 8 percent of its staff. But Olson is betting on a rebound.

"Newell shares continue to fade following a disappointing Q4 earnings report on 2/15. At this point, we believe expectations have been sufficiently rebased and that investor sentiment is now 'so bad, it's actually good'," wrote Wells Fargo analyst Bonnie Herzog.

On Thursday, Newell reported weak sales and announced that CEO Michael Polk will leave the company at the end of June. Shares of Newell Brands are about unchanged over the last week to $15.33.

If Spotify shares fall leading up to Apple's March 25th event, where the iPhone is expected to unveil streaming TV and subscription news services, it could be a reason to buy, noted Rosenblatt Securities analyst Mark Zgutowicz. "Net-net, we are buyers on any weakness in front of Apple's event," Zgutowicz said.

Earlier this week, the music-streaming service filed a complaint in Europe saying Apple Music has an unfair advantage.

The stock is down 0.2 percent over the last month.

Analysts finding cheap stocks this week:

PiperJaffray- Activision Blizzard, Overweight rating

"ATVI is down nearly 50% in the past six months and we believe investors should be 'kicking the tires,' given an improving setup in late '19 and 2020... We see five reasons to do the work on ATVI, including: increasing near-term talk on FGDL & streaming, potential E3 announcements, anticipation around improving fundamentals in '20, management's re-allocation of resources towards key franchises, and valuation... Investors are in 'waitand- see' mode on Activision and we think it's likely the company set a conservative bar for '19.... A low bar for revenue & EPS outlook should enable a hardening foundation of investor confidence as the company achieves or exceeds 1H estimates... While it may still be early, with a lack of new game catalysts in '19, we encourage patient investors to consider chipping away at a position in ATVI at current levels... Maintain OW, $52 PT..."

Rosenblatt Securities- Spotify Technology, Buy rating

"In front of Apple's March 25th reveal of an exclusive content platform, the Spotify+Hulu $9.99 bundle brings more than buzzkill to the Apple party. SPOT gets better economics with retention benefits and minimal negative impact on '19E premium gross margin, while Hulu absorbs the majority of its lost $5.99 subscription revenue (both our view)... SPOT makes a smart defensive call against an anticipated attractively priced Apple music/video bundle, while Hulu makes an aggressive offensive play for sticky OTT subscriber scale... We see a net advantage to SPOT/Hulu's music/content stack vs. what we know of Apple's content slate, with the exception of potentially attractive HBO and/or Showtime bundled pricing... Net-net, we are buyers on any weakness in front of Apple's event and raise our PT from $169 to $175 on updated DCF assumptions.."

Wells Fargo- Newell Brands, Outperform rating

"NWL shares continue to fade following a disappointing Q4 earnings report on 2/15 (-10% vs. S&P +1%)... At this point, we believe expectations have been sufficiently rebased and that investor sentiment is now 'so bad, it's actually good.' Overall, we believe the market has lost sight of the underlying value in NWL's businesses given all of the moving parts, which exiting FY19 should ultimately be a simpler, faster growing company, with significant exposure to e-commerce... While mgmt's credibility is deservedly low, we think the stock can work once NWL starts executing/delivering sequential fundamental improvement (next potential catalyst is Q1)... Importantly, we have increased conviction that there's upside potential to Q1/FY19 guidance based on our detailed, bottom-up analysis of NWL's seven continuing ops businesses... As such, we raise our FY19/20 EPS ests. to $1.70/$2.15 and our price target to $22, implying just a 10.2x FY20E P/E multiple... Bottom line, we believe the risk/reward is positive & reiterate our Outperform rating..."

Oppenheimer - Dollar General, Outperform rating

"We overall view the Q4:18 results reported by DG as mixed. Comps increased 4.0%, well ahead of a Street expectation of 2.6% aided by early SNAP benefits... Two-year comp trends accelerated to +7.3% from +7.1% in Q3... However, softer than expected gross margins and above-plan expenses led to an EPS shortfall... Management also introduced FY19 EPS guidance of $6.30-$6.50, below a Street figure of $6.64. Excluding the $50M in increased investments, the guide suggests a core business consistent with our expectations... Ahead of the print, we expected a below-consensus guide and recommended investors position to buy on weakness vs. playing for a positive catalyst... We would take advantage of the pullback this morning. DG remains a top pick for us..."

Needham- Marvell Technology, Buy rating

"MRVL's F4Q19 results were in line with revised guidance, but F1Q20 guidance was below expectations... Storage and Networking are expected to decline again Q/Q in F1Q20 driven by the weak macro environment and inventory digestion by cloud customers... Reflecting improving bookings post CNY and the 5G ramp with Samsung in F2H20, MRVL believes F1Q20 will represent the revenue trough... MRVL believes it undershipped HDD end market demand in F4Q19 and will again in F1Q20, setting up a possible recovery in F2Q20. MRVL announced it is engaged with a 2nd tier-one base station OEM for a 5G design based on a custom Fusion-M, which should sample in early FY21... While we lower estimates, we maintain our $23 PT (~18x our CY20 NG EPS est.) and are buyers on weakness given MRVL's valuation and 5G growth opportunities..."

BMO- Anthem, Outperform rating

"We reiterate our Outperform rating and raise our target price to $345 (vs. prior $335) on Anthem's higher 5-year growth targets... Credibility for these targets is driven by strong recent results, high visibility on lower drug pricing, and a range of growth and cost initiatives. Further supporting this is the evident reinvigoration of Anthem under CEO Gail Boudreaux... We see a buying opportunity with ANTM stock down [last Friday] on further selling of managed care (mostly driven by fear of radical health reform, which we think is misguided and therefore will not be sustained)..."

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Tabula Rasa HealthCare (TRHC) Trading Up 7.4%

Tabula Rasa HealthCare Inc (NASDAQ:TRHC) shares were up 7.4% on Monday . The stock traded as high as $63.56 and last traded at $62.64. Approximately 994,776 shares were traded during mid-day trading, an increase of 139% from the average daily volume of 416,121 shares. The stock had previously closed at $58.33.

A number of research firms have commented on TRHC. BidaskClub lowered shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Thursday, November 15th. Piper Jaffray Companies reaffirmed an “overweight” rating and set a $80.00 target price on shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare in a report on Thursday, December 6th. Zacks Investment Research raised shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Thursday, December 6th. Finally, Benchmark began coverage on shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare in a report on Tuesday, January 8th. They set a “buy” rating and a $85.00 target price for the company. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have issued a hold rating, eleven have assigned a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the company. The company has an average rating of “Buy” and a consensus price target of $80.44.

Get Tabula Rasa HealthCare alerts:

The company has a current ratio of 0.49, a quick ratio of 0.46 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.28. The firm has a market capitalization of $1.32 billion, a P/E ratio of 180.50, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 3.68 and a beta of 1.79.

In other Tabula Rasa HealthCare news, CFO Brian W. Adams sold 1,316 shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare stock in a transaction on Monday, January 28th. The shares were sold at an average price of $60.41, for a total transaction of $79,499.56. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this link. Also, President Orsula V. Knowlton sold 8,000 shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare stock in a transaction on Thursday, March 7th. The stock was sold at an average price of $57.02, for a total transaction of $456,160.00. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders have sold a total of 54,057 shares of company stock valued at $3,219,378 in the last ninety days. Company insiders own 14.00% of the company’s stock.

Several hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in TRHC. Bank of New York Mellon Corp grew its holdings in shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare by 34.2% in the 2nd quarter. Bank of New York Mellon Corp now owns 214,062 shares of the company’s stock valued at $13,664,000 after buying an additional 54,507 shares during the period. Arizona State Retirement System grew its holdings in shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare by 23.3% in the 3rd quarter. Arizona State Retirement System now owns 24,373 shares of the company’s stock valued at $1,979,000 after buying an additional 4,600 shares during the period. Chicago Equity Partners LLC grew its holdings in shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare by 6.4% in the 3rd quarter. Chicago Equity Partners LLC now owns 15,050 shares of the company’s stock valued at $1,222,000 after buying an additional 900 shares during the period. Comerica Bank grew its holdings in shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare by 12.5% in the 3rd quarter. Comerica Bank now owns 16,284 shares of the company’s stock valued at $1,313,000 after buying an additional 1,806 shares during the period. Finally, Wells Fargo & Company MN grew its holdings in shares of Tabula Rasa HealthCare by 673.0% in the 3rd quarter. Wells Fargo & Company MN now owns 187,511 shares of the company’s stock valued at $15,224,000 after buying an additional 163,255 shares during the period. 79.99% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.

ILLEGAL ACTIVITY WARNING: This story was originally posted by Ticker Report and is the sole property of of Ticker Report. If you are accessing this story on another publication, it was copied illegally and reposted in violation of United States and international copyright and trademark legislation. The legal version of this story can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4219289/tabula-rasa-healthcare-trhc-trading-up-7-4.html.

Tabula Rasa HealthCare Company Profile (NASDAQ:TRHC)

Tabula Rasa HealthCare, Inc operates as a healthcare technology company in the United States. It offers medication risk management, pharmacy cost management, and medicare risk adjustment services. The company offers its technology-enabled products and services to prescribers, pharmacists, and healthcare organizations for medication risk management and risk adjustment.

Further Reading: Why is cost of goods sold important?

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Investors Sell Shares of Exxon Mobil (XOM) on Strength (XOM)

Investors sold shares of Exxon Mobil Co. (NYSE:XOM) on strength during trading on Tuesday. $102.56 million flowed into the stock on the tick-up and $230.95 million flowed out of the stock on the tick-down, for a money net flow of $128.39 million out of the stock. Of all equities tracked, Exxon Mobil had the 11th highest net out-flow for the day. Exxon Mobil traded up $0.22 for the day and closed at $80.00

XOM has been the topic of a number of analyst reports. Zacks Investment Research reaffirmed a “hold” rating on shares of Exxon Mobil in a report on Saturday, November 17th. Piper Jaffray Companies reaffirmed a “hold” rating and set a $81.00 price objective on shares of Exxon Mobil in a report on Monday, November 19th. Macquarie reaffirmed a “sell” rating and set a $70.00 price objective on shares of Exxon Mobil in a report on Monday, November 19th. Raymond James downgraded shares of Exxon Mobil from a “market perform” rating to an “underperform” rating in a report on Tuesday, November 20th. Finally, BNP Paribas set a $80.00 price objective on shares of Exxon Mobil and gave the stock a “sell” rating in a report on Tuesday, November 20th. Three equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, twelve have given a hold rating and nine have issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. The stock has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $84.52.

Get Exxon Mobil alerts:

The company has a current ratio of 0.83, a quick ratio of 0.54 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.10. The firm has a market capitalization of $339.42 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 16.23, a PEG ratio of 1.75 and a beta of 0.90.

Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) last issued its quarterly earnings results on Friday, February 1st. The oil and gas company reported $1.51 earnings per share for the quarter, topping the Zacks’ consensus estimate of $1.08 by $0.43. Exxon Mobil had a net margin of 7.18% and a return on equity of 10.89%. The company had revenue of $71.90 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $78.87 billion. During the same period in the previous year, the firm earned $0.88 EPS. The firm’s quarterly revenue was up 8.1% on a year-over-year basis. On average, analysts anticipate that Exxon Mobil Co. will post 4.12 EPS for the current year.

The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Monday, March 11th. Investors of record on Monday, February 11th were paid a $0.82 dividend. This represents a $3.28 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 4.10%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Friday, February 8th. Exxon Mobil’s dividend payout ratio is currently 66.53%.

In related news, VP Bradley W. Corson sold 15,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, December 19th. The stock was sold at an average price of $72.84, for a total value of $1,092,600.00. Following the sale, the vice president now directly owns 223,461 shares in the company, valued at approximately $16,276,899.24. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at this hyperlink. Also, VP Neil A. Hansen sold 2,798 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, December 14th. The shares were sold at an average price of $76.81, for a total value of $214,914.38. Following the completion of the sale, the vice president now owns 32,800 shares in the company, valued at $2,519,368. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders own 0.08% of the company’s stock.

Several institutional investors and hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in XOM. Norges Bank bought a new stake in shares of Exxon Mobil during the fourth quarter valued at about $2,796,142,000. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund increased its position in shares of Exxon Mobil by 6,664.1% during the fourth quarter. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund now owns 31,397,540 shares of the oil and gas company’s stock valued at $460,000 after buying an additional 30,933,358 shares during the period. C WorldWide Group Holding A S bought a new stake in shares of Exxon Mobil during the third quarter valued at about $363,290,000. Morgan Stanley increased its position in shares of Exxon Mobil by 19.6% during the third quarter. Morgan Stanley now owns 22,022,731 shares of the oil and gas company’s stock valued at $1,872,372,000 after buying an additional 3,614,568 shares during the period. Finally, Geode Capital Management LLC increased its position in shares of Exxon Mobil by 7.4% during the fourth quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 52,195,792 shares of the oil and gas company’s stock valued at $3,553,133,000 after buying an additional 3,593,304 shares during the period. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 53.20% of the company’s stock.

WARNING: “Investors Sell Shares of Exxon Mobil (XOM) on Strength (XOM)” was originally published by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are reading this report on another website, it was stolen and republished in violation of U.S. & international trademark & copyright law. The legal version of this report can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4216580/investors-sell-shares-of-exxon-mobil-xom-on-strength-xom.html.

Exxon Mobil Company Profile (NYSE:XOM)

Exxon Mobil Corporation explores for and produces crude oil and natural gas in the United States, Canada/Other Americas, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia/Oceania. It operates through Upstream, Downstream, and Chemical segments. The company is also involved in the manufacture, trade, transport, and sale of crude oil, petroleum products, and other specialty products; and manufactures and markets petrochemicals, including olefins, polyolefins, aromatics, and various other petrochemicals.

Featured Story: The Discount Rate – What You Need to Know

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Thermal Energy International (TMG) Earning Somewhat Positive Media Coverage, Study Finds

Media headlines about Thermal Energy International (CVE:TMG) have been trending somewhat positive on Wednesday, according to InfoTrie. InfoTrie ranks the sentiment of press coverage by analyzing more than 6,000 blog and news sources in real-time. The firm ranks coverage of publicly-traded companies on a scale of -5 to 5, with scores closest to five being the most favorable. Thermal Energy International earned a daily sentiment score of 0.60 on their scale. InfoTrie also gave media stories about the company an news buzz score of 4 out of 10, indicating that recent press coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an effect on the company’s share price in the immediate future.

TMG stock opened at C$0.08 on Wednesday. The company has a market capitalization of $11.33 million and a P/E ratio of 18.75. Thermal Energy International has a 12-month low of C$0.07 and a 12-month high of C$0.10. The company has a current ratio of 1.40, a quick ratio of 1.23 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 72.88.

Get Thermal Energy International alerts: COPYRIGHT VIOLATION NOTICE: This article was first reported by Ticker Report and is owned by of Ticker Report. If you are reading this article on another site, it was illegally stolen and reposted in violation of U.S. and international copyright legislation. The original version of this article can be viewed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4216719/thermal-energy-international-tmg-earning-somewhat-positive-media-coverage-study-finds.html.

About Thermal Energy International

Thermal Energy International Inc engages in the development, engineering, and supply of pollution control products, heat recovery systems, and condensate return solutions in North America, Europe, China, and internationally. Its products include GEM steam traps; FLU-ACE, a direct contact condensing heat recovery system that recycles the heat lost through the boiler flue gas exhaust; and DRY-REX, a low temperature biomass drying system.

Read More: Liquidity

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Northern Oil & Gas Inc (NOG) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Northern Oil & Gas Inc  (NYSEMKT:NOG)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallMarch 12, 2019, 11:00 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Greetings, and welcome to the Northern Oil and Gas Fourth Quarter and Year End 2018 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Brandon Elliott, Chief Executive Officer. Thank you, sir. You may begin.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Jessie. Good morning, everyone. We're happy to welcome you to Northern's fourth quarter 2018 earnings call. Before we get to the results, let me cover our safe harbor language. Please be advised that our remarks today, including the answers to your questions, may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from the expectations contemplated by these forward-looking statements. Those risks include, among others, matters that we have described in our earnings release, as well as in our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on form 10-K and our quarterly reports on form 10-Q. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements.

During this conference call, we may discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA. Reconciliations of these measures to the closest GAAP measure can be found in the earnings release that we issued early this morning or in our updated investor presentation on our website.

All right, we're going to switch up the batting order this quarter. We're going to let Bahram Akradi, our Chairman walk through some comments as both a Board Member and a large shareholder. We will then turn the call over to Nich O'Grady, our CFO for his comments and to highlight some of the financials. Then, I will take it back and make a few summary comments and then, we will go ahead and open the call up to Q&A. We obviously have a few others in the room with us today to help with the Q&A portion, our President and Founder, Michael Reger; Adam Dirlam, our EVP of Land; Jim Evans, our VP of Engineering, as well as Chad Allen, our Chief Accounting Officer.

With that, I will turn the call over to Bahram.

Bahram Akradi -- Chairman

Thanks, Brandon. Nick and Brandon provided feedback to me from their most recent investor meetings. I'm looking forward to taking this opportunity to provide you with our strategy and forward path for Northern Oil and Gas. Let me start by saying, it's always crucial to listen to all the investors, analyze, rationalize and incorporate into our overall strategy, all that makes sense. And finally, decisively make the best decision for the entity itself in this case Northern Oil and Gas, by always focusing on what's best for Northern Oil and Gas, our shareholders, vendors and employees will be rewarded.

So here is an attempt to provide a clear and concise path for Northern Oil and Gas in 2019, 2020 and beyond. Number one, remain free cash flow positive with oil prices in the $40 range. Number two, keep the debt-to-EBITDA below 2 at all times and generally closer to 1. Number three, broad debt adjusted cash flow per share. We view this as the best metric to show true meaningful growth. Four, grow the Company's production and cash flow without compromising any of the three points I just made. Five, be prepared to replace our second lien bonds on or before May 2020. This should create up to $25 million of incremental cash flow.

Six, coinciding with replacement of the second lien bonds begin a sustainable dividend, returning a portion of this incremental cash flow to our shareholders. And number seven, unless essentially strategic, all acquisitions must be accretive to all metrics. The rest of the team will provide more detail to the outline that I just conveyed.

Before I turn it over to Nick, I would like to respond to the comment, we often hear that we as a non-operator do not have control of our own destiny. This may be true with much smaller non-operators. Northern Oil & Gas has significant liquidity over 157,000 acres interest in over 5,000 wells in the basin and we work with over 40 different operators. This gives us an incredible amount of flexibility to deploy significant capital, efficiently and accurately into new opportunities and our 2018 results demonstrates disadvantage.

Over the last year, we have more than doubled the size of the Company maintaining the same 20 employees that we have had. We can do this again and again with the same team. I love the efficiency of Northern Oil and Gas, and I want to thank the Northern team for an exceptional execution in 2018. Thank you for listening and I look forward to answering your questions later in the call.

Now let me turn it over to Northern CFO, Nick O'Grady. Nick?

Nicholas O'Grady -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Bahram. A year ago, as Northern began its resurgence, knowing we had a good high margin asset base, we set out to grow that asset base to a size where it could generate more cash than it requires to sustain itself. And to do so in a manner that allows for flexibility and allocation in return of that capital. As I've said tongue in cheek to many investors, we were doing this before, it was cool. Given the volatility, we've seen in the sector since we last reported, it's worthwhile having a quick discussion about our leverage, our cash flow profile and the steps we've undertaken as a management team to shield the Company from the ups and downs of the commodity cycles.

The first issue worth discussing is one-off margins. We've highlighted this to investors in recent presentations, but I'll say it again. Our asset, a combination of high oil cuts, low operating costs and extremely low G&A simply has higher margins. As a result, the cash break-even point for our asset is very low and we believe, we would continue to produce excess cash flow without hedges down to $40 per barrel based on reasonable activity assumptions in these various scenarios. Our hedging program among the best in North America, insurers will earn more than that for each of the next three fiscal years. And as a result, we should continue to generate more cash to augment the business.

Our debt-to-EBITDA finished the year at 2.3 times trailing at about 1.7 times last quarter annualized. We would expect that at the current levels of activity and the strip for this to continue to ratchet down throughout the end of this year and beyond. After a very busy back half of 2018, our maintenance capital program this year is likely the highest it will be for some time. And so the sustaining capital call on our asset will likely narrow in the coming years. This is important, because as our hedge book steps down over time, so does the call on our cash flow to maintain itself.

In a nutshell, we took a balance sheet from over 6 times levered a year ago and build a cash machine that should continue to derisk itself over time. Half of our management incentive compensation is tied to our absolute stock price performance. The other half is tied to debt adjusted cash flow. For those of you unfamiliar, debt adjusted cash flow in simple terms, treats all debt as if it were shares. It encourages us to one, not leverage the Company up in any way to create unsustainable cash flows, but risk the Company.

And two, it treats debt repayment and thus retirement of debt adjusted shares on a more equal footing. In the end, if we chose to grow faster and deploy all of our cash flow, we would likely show significantly higher growth. However, we are not solving for a growth rate, but for a total return to our shareholders. Shrinking our enterprise through debt repayment increases the shareholders call on the cash flow. This is something often forgotten by many until the debt actually has to be paid back. Therefore, over the next few years, even with only modest mid to low-single digit top line growth, we can use our large expected free cash flow yield to create a much greater total return, including dividends and bolt-on acquisitions that augment this free cash flow profile, as well as grow our inventory.

For 2019, our guidance in the release implies 37% year-over-year production growth, in part driven by a very strong exit rate to the year, which was driven both by acquisitions and significant organic growth in the back half of 2018. The midpoint of our 2019 guidance implies 30 net wells and approximately 35,000 Boe per day, which is toward the lower end of the 30 to 36 well forecast we gave in November. Understand clearly, we don't see a degradation of capital efficiency or higher decline rates, instead, we are simply updating our expectations based on recent curtailments and the timing of completions due to lower oil prices after a volatile quarter and tough winter period.

All in all, it's important to know that, of course, if we chose, we could more aggressively seek higher growth. But again, with a lower spending implied in our guidance will simply generate more free cash flow instead. We'll monitor activity in the field to determine from time-to-time whether warrants a more aggressive approach.

Moving onto our cost expectations. Our differential guidance is relatively in line with previous years at $4.50 to $6.50. Things that will impact our differentials are Canadian production, pipeline expansion timing and overall production growth in the basin. Differentials have generally improved steadily throughout the first quarter of 2019 from very tough levels in the fourth quarter. I'll remind investors that railcar availability, a big issue in the fourth quarter is being solved longer term. So while basis issues may pop up from time-to-time, we expect excess rail capacity to mitigate the issue better in the future.

Lease operating expense was a stellar $6.43 per Boe for the fourth quarter and we are guiding to $6.75 to $7.75 per Boe for 2019. We expect LOE to rise modestly from tje fourth quarter with a flattening of the overall activity, it still be lower year-over-year. G&A will continue to be industry leading with cash G&A expected to fall between a $1 and a $1.25 per Boe. We believe this is less than half of the industry average. For frame of reference, the Northern shareholder should accrete over $20 million of cash flow per year in G&A savings versus a typical E&P at a $3 G&A charge.

As Bahram mentioned, as we grow this business both organically and inorganically, we believe we can drive these units -- unit costs lower over time continuing to expand our margins. We've spoken with our investors about the long term plans for the second lien bonds and our desire to retire them. These bonds are callable in May of 2020 at 104% of par. The ultimate recipe for us in terms of how best to complete the refinancing is one that continues to evolve as we do our own internal analysis and seek that of our advisors.

What we can tell you is that we expect, depending on the expansion of our credit line that we would see substantial interest savings net to the shareholder for any refinancing we do. Our $750 million credit facility is strong and most likely to get stronger and so we do not believe we have to replace the bonds with a like kind of size offering. The question of the timing around calling these bonds early will come down to a mechanically precise calculation of the payback period for the extra cost associated with doing so.

In addition, the more restrictive elements of our 2018 debt restructuring will be removed and with more appropriate covenants for a covenant with our -- for a Company with our credit profile, we will at that time be able to be more aggressive as it pertains to share buybacks and dividends. I will caveat all this by saying, however that as Bahram stated before, we are extremely leverage sensitive. Buybacks and dividends must go hand in hand with low leverage and leverage that can continue to be reduced over time. We spent a ton of time on the road recently, speaking with all kinds of investors. The apathy and poor performance of energy stocks over the past decade has led to a real struggle to define what strategy will be the most effective long term.

For us with our strong margins and strong cash flow profile, we think a balanced approach is one that makes sense. We believe that we can, one, continue to reduce debt year-in, year-out. Two, while share repurchases aren't extremely popular these days given our extremely low market valuation, we believe they compete for capital. I get asked sometimes directly by investors what the right valuation for our businesses. We of course, have our internal views and analysis. And it's a difficult question to answer on the spot. But we can tell you one thing, it is not the current valuation the market ascribes to us.

Three, we will continue to augment the asset both at the ground game level and with packages for sale over time. We believe these only add to our inventory, reduce the pull on our legacy acreage and at the same time generally adds the long term free cash flow wedge we generate. And finally, four, dividends are clearly the favorite instrument by most investors today, but there has been some debate about the best way to do it. We believe a modest regular dividend is important for consistency, but we would not argue with the idea that in very high price cycles or over time, as leverage falls dramatically, that it could make sense for special dividends from time-to-time. The key tenant of all the things I discussed above is balance. We are in a depleting business, so we must generate returns, return some of that, reinvest in the asset and augmented by tacking on when appropriate.

We are ultimately a financing Company. We pay for land, wells we participate in, and receive an economic return on the back end. It is critical in our opinion, as we earn returns that vastly exceed our cost of capital to lock in those returns as we deploy, said capital. We believe that risks are broadly asymmetric for hedging. If we're wrong and prices go higher, so do likely will be activity giving us more volume for future prices. If the hedge is proved right and prices crash, activity is likely to fall and we become naturally more hedged and can harvest more cash.

In conclusion, we're among -- the most hedged at the best prices of any Company in North America and we expect to continue to be opportunistically. Before I conclude, there's one final point I want to address. If you see Page 13 of our updated investor presentation, you'll see we give our average cumulative performance by vintage for our wells, just like we give you actual fully loaded well costs. We also give you our overall well performance, not theoretical costs and not cherry picked well performance.

I'll conclude by saying, we are all very proud of what we achieved to make the Company so sound financially, but we are by no means satiated. We will continue to find ways to make Northern better, more competitive and a more desirable investment.

I'll now turn it over to Brandon.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

All right. Thanks, Nick. I'm going to summarize from a high level what I hope you've heard from us this morning. First, I hope you realize that we have very good alignment from our Board, our Chairman and our Management Team, that our Board is striving to align all of us with shareholders. Second, I hope you heard some clear objectives. We are positioning this Company to generate durable cash flows, regardless of commodity prices by controlling our capital spend both higher and lower depending on the commodity prices that are in front of us. We are driving debt lower, with debt-to-EBITDA sub 2 times now and striving for 1 times to 1.5 times as soon as possible.

We will maintain as Nick mentioned, an active hedging program, locking in some of the returns we expect when we commit shareholders capital. As Nick mentioned, the cash flow from these hedges will also allow us to invest counter cyclically should commodity prices fall. We are incentivized and focused on growing debt adjusted cash flow per share and total shareholder returns. We will continue to look consolidate non-op working interest in the basin, but only if acquisitions do not compromise our objectives. We will look for an opportunity to refinance our second line debt when the timing is right, and that will allow us to move the conversation to a sustainable and long term plan to return capital to shareholders.

Third, I hope you heard from Nick that the financial performance of this Company is incredibly strong and gaining momentum. The capital allocation efforts that we have been working on for some time now are truly bearing fruit in not only higher production but better, more profitable production as well, with low cost and significant leverage on the G&A line. We are in a position to generate resilient and sustainable cash flow across a wide range of commodity prices both higher and lower.

Finally, we see the activity that will present us plenty of opportunities to invest capital. Permitting activity in the Williston Basin has been steadily increasing over the last several months. We consented to 135 gross wells in the fourth quarter alone, equating to 9.1 net wells. Our drilling and completion list grew year-over-year, ending the year with 412 gross wells in process, representing 22.8 net wells. We will continue to not only pick and choose what wells to consent to based on our return expectations, but we will also pick and choose, what wells and drilling units we want to grow our interest in through our ground game acquisition strategy.

Hence, as you've heard a couple of times now, contrary to what many people think, we will actually control our spending both higher and lower as returns dictate. This has been a very challenging investment climate for our shareholders. We know you are frustrated and I can assure you that our Board, our Chairman and this Management Team are frustrated as well. We have positioned this Company to thrive and we are trying to make this Company better day-by-day. We think we have a Company and a strategy that should excel at generating returns for shareholders, not focusing blindly on growth, but focusing on generating returns on invested capital and giving some of those returns back to you our shareholders.

In closing, we have a small nimble team, but this team has some very large company capabilities. We have participated in over 5,000 wells. More than 30% of all Bakken and Three Forks wells drilled in the Williston Basin. We can make rapid, but very exact capital allocation decisions day-in and day-out. We can leverage these large Company capabilities into both small and large acquisitions to grow and often outgrow our operating partners, not only in production, but also in core inventory and returns as well. This is the benefit of our non-op model. It may not be the benefit of all non-ops, but this particular non-op has built the size and scale to drive these large company advantages in a very nimble and exacting way.

With that, I will turn the call over to the operator for the Q&A portion of the call. Jessie, if you would please give the instructions for the Q&A?

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Absolutely. (Operator Instructions). Our first question comes from the line of Neal Dingmann with SunTrust. Please proceed with your question.

Neal Dingmann -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Good morning, all. Brandon my question may be for Nick or even Bahram, when you think about sort of I guess it's on that Slide 5, where you talked about the flexibility, could -- when you talk about, how you sort of rank as far as shareholder, you mentioned this, I think Nick did, I know in a bit detail already, but your -- there is flexibility of and sort of priority of returning shareholder value versus just growth out there right now, given the sort of the flexible plan that you have?

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. I think you heard Nick mentioned that the -- it's going to be a little bit all the above, right, I mean, we're going to evaluate returns day-in and day-out to the extent that we can see additional working interest that Adam and his team can see become available in units that we think are going to be outstanding results. Those are small ground game acquisitions we're going to make, but we're gonna try to balance that, I think, we've guided net well adds as a pretty responsible and reasonable approach to the year sets up, good sequential production growth beginning really in Q2 and Q3 and Q4 and sets up 2020, and again protects our cash flow, that you've heard us say in a numerous times.

Neal Dingmann -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Okay. And then looking at Slide 14, where you just on your map and listing all those wells as a great Slide, by the way. Your thought, when -- either two things, so when either Mike's looking for deals out there or when you are looking to participate, you have -- has that sort of Tier 1 area, which I'll consider Tier 1 has that expanded or maybe you could just talk about sort of your focus area. I know, think recently, I think it was Oasis that added a bit of Tier 1 further west almost in the Montana. I'm just wonder if you could comment, how you all sort of focus on a regional basis?

Michael Reger -- President, Founder and Chairman Emeritus

Neal, thanks. This is Mike. You've seen us that the what used to be Tier 2 turn into a Tier 1 and what used to be Tier 3 turn into Tier 2 plus. This is the first quarter where we've expanded the map probably by double on this page. We also wanted to have a broad swap of different operators just showing everybody's capabilities in the field. You can see some wells, even some wells are up further west on the Montana line that are significant. Continental started drilling wells down in Billings County on the border of Billings and start down in that pronghorn area with significant results. They haven't had a rig down there in years. And they started in and brought a well on line here in January. You can see everybody here, there is record wells every day. We're in most of these records at Continental and Marathon and Hess and others have really significantly brought on and a new wells with this new completion design and we're the direct beneficiary of all this advancement.

Neal Dingmann -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

And then if I could just Mike, I've got you one last one just on M&A, just opportunities that you're seeing out there is as good as ever. Are there less -- more, any color you could add to that? Thank you.

Michael Reger -- President, Founder and Chairman Emeritus

You bet, Neal. I think the big issue is we continue to see larger acquisitions that we analyzed. Again, it's going to come down to whether it's a creative on all metrics or not. As you saw from our activity in 2018, we are the market for non-op in the Williston as far as the larger acquisitions we will continue to analyze every single one. As far as the ground game goes, it's never been this good. As you probably heard from other operators in the conference calls we've had, they're talking about expanding free cash flow and which means paring back their CapEx. First thing to go is going to be non-op exposure and we're going to be the direct beneficiary of that -- of those divestitures.

Neal Dingmann -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Good to hear. Thank you all.

Bahram Akradi -- Chairman

The only thing I would add, from a ground game standpoint in 2018, we saw closed about 90 deals give or take, that's about 22 to 23 a quarter, kind of through 2019 to date, we've closed 25 deals, we've got about seven in process. So now the near term dealing opportunity is the high rates of return, those are the types of opportunities that we're focusing on.

Neal Dingmann -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

So even on a little bit ahead today than last year.

Bahram Akradi -- Chairman

You got it.

Neal Dingmann -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Perfect. Thank you, all.

Operator

Thank you. The next question is from the line of Jeff Grampp with Northland Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Jeff Grampp -- Northland Capital Markets -- Analyst

Good morning, guys.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, Jeff.

Jeff Grampp -- Northland Capital Markets -- Analyst

I appreciate all the shareholder friendly commentary in the prepared remarks.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Thanks.

Jeff Grampp -- Northland Capital Markets -- Analyst

Was hoping Nick, you kind of touched a little bit on 2019 being your highest kind of maintenance CapEx year was just hoping maybe get a little bit more details on that front, maybe in terms of CapEx or wells you need to kind of keep production maybe in that mid 30s level? And can you touch on maybe how you guys expect that to change in 2020 and beyond?

Nicholas O'Grady -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. It's pretty easy to explain. Our -- obviously, you had a huge ramp in activity as oil prices were in the 70s and in late 80s. And we had a huge organic ramp and obviously that goes to the things we acquired as well. So our decline rate is probably mid 30s this year. It'll step down into that and given where the rig count is, we'd expect pretty stable activity and so that should naturally step down into the 20s and beyond. So if that's, let's call it, 28 to 30 depending on -- a lot of it is less than number of wells and really the timing in which they come online. So if we put 30 wells on in the fourth quarter versus steadily through the year, it's a different scenario. But what we tell you is that the way our engineers have risked and modeled this, that had 30 well should step down a couple wells a year throughout that. So and certainly at the strip we would expect that to be kind of the base case scenario.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

And Jeff just I'll put some color on '19 and obviously, no surprise to anybody that the Midwest and the North has had some pretty good snow year. So hence, accommodation was a little bit of the curtailment stuff that we talked about in the release that the timing of those net wells in '19 going to be a little bit more back end weighted and out of the Q1 and then we'll watch and see how warm it gets and what road restrictions look like, but that's kind of how we're caveat in the year a little bit.

Jeff Grampp -- Northland Capital Markets -- Analyst

Sure. Understood. That's really helpful. And for my follow-up, it looks like -- at least relative to the original '19 guidance you put out, kind of the implied average well cost looks to be more or less unchanged from where a lot of your '18 actuals were. So I was curious, given the -- it's the cost environments and the other commentary we've heard elsewhere about, some service deflation. Are you guys seeing any of that coming through on AFEs or is there some general conservatism there to keep flat well costs, just kind of curious, what you guys are kind of baking into the model here?

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. We really didn't see a lot of inflation, as we came through last year and so we're not expecting a lot of deflation this year. I would say they've been pretty stable at about that $8 million, certainly at the rig count, if the rig count drifts and oil prices stay down here, maybe toward the back end of '19, you could see a little bit deflation, but we're not baking that in at this point.

Jeff Grampp -- Northland Capital Markets -- Analyst

Understood. Makes sense. Thanks for the time, guys.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Phillips Johnston with Capital One Securities. Please, proceed with your question.

Phillips Johnston -- Capital One Securities -- Analyst

Hi, guys. Thanks. My question on maintenance CapEx and decline rates was just answered, but just wanted to follow-up on Nick's comments about possible timing for refinancing? And the secondly notes, would an early call sometime this fall is still potentially make economic sense and what's some of the calculus that goes into that decision?

Nicholas O'Grady -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. It's pretty easy, I mean, make whole [calculations are really for those you don't know, so the bonds are callable at 104 next May. You can call them today if you want and typically then you'd have to pay the interest that you'd owe between now and then reduced by the Treasury rate. And so really, if you go to June that, it will basically step down each month between now and then. What I tell you that we're looking at all of the different scenarios and the benefits and costs right everything has a cost and a benefit. And so really it comes down to how much money can we save and what the payback period is on that.

So I think, not to be coy, but it could be tomorrow and it could be May of 2020. I think we're really going to spend a lot of time in the next few months with our advisors and think about the best and most importantly, least expensive ways to do it that really accrete, because we don't want to, just to solve tomorrow's problem, do something that costs us long term money. And so we'll just be very thoughtful about it. Obviously, we'd love to pay a dividend tomorrow. So it's on our mind to figure out the fastest solution to do it, but we also want to make sure it's the best one.

Phillips Johnston -- Capital One Securities -- Analyst

Yeah. Makes sense. Thanks, guys.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our next question is from the line of John Aschenbeck with Seaport Global. Please proceed with your question.

John Aschenbeck -- Seaport Global Securities LLC -- Analyst

Hi. Good morning, everyone and thanks for taking my questions. Yeah. So before I jump in, just have to tip my hat to your prepared remarks, which frankly took a lot of my questions off the table, but I do want to follow-up on couple of the goals you discussed. Just specifically the second lien and -- second lien refine the dividend. I apologize, if I missed this, but I believe, there currently is a restriction in the place on the second liens that prohibit issuance of a dividend. So I'm just trying to get an idea of kind of the timing of a dividend, how that relates to the second lien retirement. Could you actually get a waiver on that restriction or would you have to indeed wait until -- until the second liens are retired? Thanks.

Nicholas O'Grady -- Chief Financial Officer

There are numerous ways you could -- number one, we have restricted payments, so we certainly could pay one tomorrow and use some of that basket and then try to time it around that. The second part is that, yes, not necessarily a waiver, but you could always do a consent and do that. We've already done one, when we did the RBL. But honestly, I think that, we don't, I think most of the second lien holder's sake and for our sake, we really want to have the balance sheet to the final solution of what we've always planned.

Bahram Akradi -- Chairman

And I'm going to add to this. This is Bahram. Ultimately, as I mentioned, we want to build yet in the stronger Northern Oil and Gas. So my desire is to find a path to pay off the second lien, replace it with a much cheaper capital. As I mentioned before, when we do that coinciding with that is the time to start a sustainable dividend. The goal for the Company long term is to maintain a debt-to-EBITDA of under one and a nice dividend that is sustainable and we can continue to methodically grow that dividend for our shareholders.

We're not going to do anything irrational. We're not going to jump the gun. We still want to make this Company bigger and stronger. So we can go through any periods of volatility with commodities. We've made a tremendous amount of progress over the last 18 months, as you guys can see and we still have higher and higher goals and standards for our Company. And we're going to take care of Northern oil and Gas, as I mentioned before, and the entity will take care of all constituencies involved with it. Hopefully, that clears this for you and others who are maybe have the same question.

John Aschenbeck -- Seaport Global Securities LLC -- Analyst

Okay. Got it. That's really helpful. It actually leads perfectly into my -- into my follow up just on the overall dividend strategy Nick, you mentioned in your prepared remarks potentially issuing special dividends in the event of higher prices, higher cash flow. Just wondering if you're also considering other ways to flex a dividend with higher prices such as, maybe targeting 1% of cash flow. So yeah, we just love to get your thoughts on what you guys are considering, additional options to just return excess cash flow through a dividend? Thanks.

Nicholas O'Grady -- Chief Financial Officer

I was a history major in college, which might not dovetail to be CFO of a public company, but, I have a long memory and I think dividends are the right thing to do. But I want to remind everyone on the call, I watched the birth of the upstream MLP and the disaster that ensued from that. And so in my prepared comments, I talked about that we are in a depleting business and so while, we certainly enjoy some of the best margins in the business and we want to be able to pay that back.

We also believe that it is about balance and making sure that we can continue to grow the entity because often times, if you don't reinvest in the future, you put yourself at risk. So if you do something like a percentage of cash flow, I certainly think we can formalize a strategy of when special dividends and how the regular dividend would grow. And I think we will do that when it's appropriate. But I'd be very cautious on setting some esoteric target, because ultimately that's what got those companies in trouble.

And when, -- for example, when you're paying out a fixed dollar amount in any business where the revenues are volatile, the only thing worse than making your dividend do big is cutting it. And so we want to make sure we can do it in a way where the investors know what to expect and I think that's really important. But at the same time that we do what's right for the entity long term.

John Aschenbeck -- Seaport Global Securities LLC -- Analyst

Okay. Great. Very well said. I appreciate the time. Thanks.

Nicholas O'Grady -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is in the line of Jason Wangler with Imperial Capital. Please proceed with your question.

Jason Wangler -- Imperial Capital, LLC -- Analyst

Good morning, all.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, Jason.

Jason Wangler -- Imperial Capital, LLC -- Analyst

May be asking from just a different way as you're looking at the second liens and things and obviously generating the free cash flow, would at least the near term be basically just to continue to pay down, I assume that the credit facility as you get those cash flows in, as you kind of get position to refinance those, whether it's, as Nick said, tomorrow or May 2020.

Nicholas O'Grady -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes.

Jason Wangler -- Imperial Capital, LLC -- Analyst

Okay. That's good enough for me. I just want to make sure.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

That's the only one word answer you'll ever hear from Nick.

Jason Wangler -- Imperial Capital, LLC -- Analyst

Those are the best ones.

Nicholas O'Grady -- Chief Financial Officer

I'm known for my best. (ph)

Jason Wangler -- Imperial Capital, LLC -- Analyst

I was curious too, on the hedging side. Obviously, you guys have been pretty aggressive there. I think it's, 63% or something of this year's production. Is that a level we should kind of think about going forward? Is where you want to be? Is it higher or lower or just kind of where your thoughts are on the general level of it?

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

I think that's about a good place to kind of benchmark us against. I mean, I think we feel like obviously as we're committing capital to returns, as we pulled everybody over and over again, we're using the strip at the time we commit that capital. So we think we should hedge some of it. So yeah, we're going to run that kind of hedge book as you see it laid out. I would say fairly consistent. We'll be opportunistic at times, but yeah that's a good level.

Jason Wangler -- Imperial Capital, LLC -- Analyst

I appreciate it. I'll turn back.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Jason.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions). Our next question is from the line of Derrick Whitfield with Stifel. Please proceed with your question.

Derrick Whitfield -- Stifel -- Analyst

Good morning all and congrats on a strong quarter and update.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Derrick.

Derrick Whitfield -- Stifel -- Analyst

All right. So two quick questions on your operations, updates and comments perhaps for Brandon or Mike. I definitely agree that Page 14 is impressive given the area of extent of the current core fairway. Do you have a view of your inventory depth of 1 million barrel type wells?

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. We've got Jim Evans in here and he's shaking his head saying, hi, we just finished year end reserves and so we're updating those type curves and updating some of those results. So probably a little early we'll maybe get an inventory update here in the near future.

Derrick Whitfield -- Stifel -- Analyst

Got it. And then my...

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

But the long answer is I think we are continuing to see improvements even in the core, apples-to-apples as operators are adjusting, completions, we are continuing to see gains in well efficiency. I think you heard Nick mentioned that as well that we continue to see that. So we feel good that the core is improving and as you heard Mike said, even stepping outside the core, we're seeing some pretty significant improvement on that border between core and Tier 1 and as well out from Tier 1 to Tier 2, but we'll get you updated in inventory numbers maybe in a little bit.

Adam Dirlam -- Executive Vice President of Land

Derrick, this is Adam. The only other thing that I'd add there is from an operator standpoint, we're starting to see kind of the bell curve tightening. So you're seeing, some of the other operators that were slow to kind of catch up on the completion methodologies, see kind of the best-in-class performers and kind of tailor their completions to some of the better completion methodologies that we're seeing.

Derrick Whitfield -- Stifel -- Analyst

Sounds good. Definitely understood. And then as a really a build on your last comments there. If you look at Page 14, are there one to two wells out of that group of wells that really surprised you versus your pre-drill estimates?

Michael Reger -- President, Founder and Chairman Emeritus

This is Mike, Derrick. I would say that everything in the core has started to surprise us over the last year. You start to see some of these peak 30 day averages over 4,000 barrels of oil you have some that have come on in to doing 100,000 barrels in 30 days, it's just really unbelievable production results from these new completion designs. We've seen wells in device come in that have -- that are double our original EUR estimate. We've seen -- we saw Continental moved down to Billings County where they haven't had a rig in there for five years. They drilled one well right in the middle of where we have a pretty significant acreage position. We bought an AMI partner of Continental out about five, six years ago. And that acreage has just been sitting down there held by production with one well.

Continental moved a rig in and drilled a well that has a 30 day average of 13,050 Boe. So we're encouraged by this new completion design, it's opening up the entire field. And you can see and I'll just reiterate what Nick said and what several others have said, the Slide that talks about our type curves. Our 2018 well, in aggregate are tracking over 1 million barrel type curve. That isn't cherry pick, that's our 2018 well set. So and that's that's 475 plus wells. This field really turned itself on and we've never been this excited about the rock.

Derrick Whitfield -- Stifel -- Analyst

Very helpful Mike. Thanks for the colors, guys.

Bahram Akradi -- Chairman

Yeah, Derrick.

Operator

Thank you. The next question is from the line of Lenny Raymond with Johnson Rice. Please proceed with your question.

Lenny Raymond -- Johnson Rice -- Analyst

Hi, guys. How are you doing today?

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Good, Lenny. Thanks.

Lenny Raymond -- Johnson Rice -- Analyst

So do you have a breakdown of how much of 2019 activity, we weighted toward public operators opposed to private and leasing it more public operators as privates are deferring completion activity with the lower oil prices?

Adam Dirlam -- Executive Vice President of Land

Lenny, this is Adam. I'll Just give you a rundown, so our D&C list is kind of currently weighted toward Continental, Whiting, Slawson, Conoco and Marathon kind of in that order give or take. And that hasn't necessarily changed even from 2018, and same as kind of our elections that we're seeing. So the cadence is effectively kind of remain the same kind of since the back half of 2018.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

So yeah, Lenny the Slawson obviously the only -- really private on there that's on that, probably the top -- almost the top 90% of the D&C list is basically every names you would all recognize except the one private being Slawson.

Lenny Raymond -- Johnson Rice -- Analyst

Great.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

And maybe you wouldn't recognize Equinor just because that's Statoil now, but everyone else is public.

Lenny Raymond -- Johnson Rice -- Analyst

That's very helpful. And then also you've historically talked about that we would see a 40-60 split first half to second half, and is this year similar to that or should we expect more of a split between first year completions and second half as you all alluded to earlier in the presentation?

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. Lenny, you're correct. We do normally come into the year with a little bit of a 40-60 split. But we are looking out the window up here in Minneapolis and similar winter weather, kind of up in this area. The country probably has a stack in those completions a little bit more to the back half than normal just given winter snow pack and some early concern on maybe road restrictions. We haven't seen it yet, but you know us, we do try to take that into and build a little bit account as we start the year, so maybe a little bit more back end weighted than the normal 40-60.

Lenny Raymond -- Johnson Rice -- Analyst

Perfect. Thank you. That's all I have today.

Operator

Thank you. We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. So I'd like to pass the floor back over to Mr. Elliott for any additional concluding comments.

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

All right. Thanks Jessie. We appreciate everyone's participation in the call and your interest in Northern Oil and Gas. Do take note that we have a busy schedule over the next couple of months at some conferences around the country, and some of those details are in our press release. So we look forward to seeing some of you on the road and we will hope to plan to talk to all of you again next quarter. Jessie, you can give the replay instructions. We appreciate everyone's attention.

Operator

Thank you. If you'd like to access the audio replay of today's event, please dial (877) 660-6853 or (201) 612-7415. Then enter ID number 13688118. Again this does conclude today's conference. We thank you for your participation and you may now disconnect your lines.

Duration: 46 minutes

Call participants:

Brandon Elliott -- Chief Executive Officer

Bahram Akradi -- Chairman

Nicholas O'Grady -- Chief Financial Officer

Neal Dingmann -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Michael Reger -- President, Founder and Chairman Emeritus

Jeff Grampp -- Northland Capital Markets -- Analyst

Phillips Johnston -- Capital One Securities -- Analyst

John Aschenbeck -- Seaport Global Securities LLC -- Analyst

Jason Wangler -- Imperial Capital, LLC -- Analyst

Derrick Whitfield -- Stifel -- Analyst

Adam Dirlam -- Executive Vice President of Land

Lenny Raymond -- Johnson Rice -- Analyst

More NOG analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Monday, March 11, 2019

Intermolecular Inc (IMI) Files 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended on December 31, 2018

Intermolecular Inc (NASDAQ:IMI) files its latest 10-K with SEC for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2018. Intermolecular Inc provides support materials for the semiconductor industry. It generates revenue through the sale of its products to a semiconductor device, semiconductor materials, and equipment companies mainly in the Asia-Pacific markets. Intermolecular Inc has a market cap of $48.760 million; its shares were traded at around $0.98 with and P/S ratio of 1.44.

For the last quarter Intermolecular Inc reported a revenue of $6.32 million, compared with the revenue of $10.55 million during the same period a year ago. For the latest fiscal year the company reported a revenue of $33.7 million, a decrease of 9.5% from the previous year. For the last five years Intermolecular Inc had an average revenue decline of 11.2% a year.

The reported loss per diluted share was 7 cents for the year, compared with the loss per share of $0.47 in the previous year. The Intermolecular Inc had an operating margin of -12.92%, compared with the operating margin of -25.95% a year before. The 10-year historical median operating margin of Intermolecular Inc is -16.07%. The profitability rank of the company is 3 (out of 10).

At the end of the fiscal year, Intermolecular Inc has the cash and cash equivalents of $8.35 million, compared with $6.09 million in the previous year. The company had no long term debt. The interest coverage to the debt is 1.2, which is not a favorable level. Intermolecular Inc has a financial strength rank of 8 (out of 10).

At the current stock price of $0.98, Intermolecular Inc is traded at 22.2% discount to its historical median P/S valuation band of $1.26. The P/S ratio of the stock is 1.44, while the historical median P/S ratio is 1.86. The stock lost 30.5% during the past 12 months.

Directors and Officers Recent Trades:

10% Owner Ventures Ii, L.p. Redpoint sold 200,000 shares of IMI stock on 03/01/2019 at the average price of $1. Former 10% Owner Neil S Subin sold 205,000 shares of IMI stock on 02/22/2019 at the average price of $1.1. 10% Owner Neil S Subin sold 4,942 shares of IMI stock on 02/20/2019 at the average price of $1.1.

For the complete 20-year historical financial data of IMI, click here.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Why Chipotle Mexican Grill Stock Popped 14.7% in February

What happened

Shares of Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) rose nearly 15% last month, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence, after the restaurant giant reported impressive fourth-quarter results.

So what

Chipotle's stock entered February with strong momentum following a 22.7% spike in January. The stock's ascent steepened after the company announced fourth-quarter comparable sales, revenue, and earnings growth that topped Wall Street's expectations. 

Chipotle's 6.1% comp growth was well above analysts' projections for 4.5% growth. Moreover, revenue rose 10.4% to $1.23 billion, while adjusted earnings per share increased 11% to $1.72. Those figures also surpassed consensus estimates, which had been for $1.19 billion in revenue and $1.37 in adjusted EPS.

These gains were fueled in part by a 65.6% surge in digital sales, which accounted for nearly 13% of Chipotle's revenue in the fourth quarter. The company's investments in digital technology, drive-through lanes, and expanded delivery options are helping Chipotle rapidly become a leader in mobile food orders.

A Chipotle Mexican Grill restaurant

Digital orders are boosting sales at Chipotle's restaurants. Image source: Chipotle Mexican Grill. 

Now what

Chipotle's digital initiatives should position the company to benefit from the trend toward app-based orders and delivery, thereby helping to offset declines in traditional retail traffic. Investors have taken notice, and the stock is now up more than 40% so far in 2019. 

Yet even with only 2,500 stores in the U.S. -- compared with more than 6,000 for Taco Bell -- Chipotle has plenty of room left for expansion. As such, new restaurant openings, combined with several other powerful growth drivers, could help to drive Chipotle's stock price even higher in the years ahead.

Friday, March 8, 2019

6 of the Most Expensive Stocks That Could Go On Sale

The most expensive stocks often receive a disproportionate share of the coverage in the financial news industry. Since those stocks often emerge from cutting-edge industries, they tend to win investor attention as they often represent the future.

Assuming the company earns a profit, they usually get classified as the most expensive stock through their price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. The average P/E ratio for an S&P 500 company comes in at about 21.4. However, these stocks command much higher P/E ratios, often into the triple digits. Due to their usually phenomenal growth, these stocks can maintain triple-digit multiples for years.

However, high growth rarely lasts forever. While slowing growth rarely makes these equities cheap stocks, it becomes a time when many of the most expensive stocks go on sale. These six equities, which have often become the most expensive stocks in the recent past, appear poised to trade at sale prices:


Compare Brokers
Fade Chipotle Stock As It Rallies Towards $500Fade Chipotle Stock As It Rallies Towards $500Source: Shutterstock

Chipotle (CMG)

Fast-food stocks rarely make it on a list of most expensive stocks, but the success of the healthy fast food trend Chipotle (NYSE:CMG) pioneered has taken that equity to record highs. Not even outbreaks of E. coli or other cases of food poisoning have not permanently derailed its move higher.

Today, CMG stock trades at a P/E of 98. Profit growth takes the forward P/E to just under 40. However, I think Chipotle’s days of trading at an elevated multiple may end soon. Other fast-food eateries have latched on to the healthy food trend. Restaurants such as Zoë’s Kitchen, Modern Market and many others have emerged. Moreover, established brands such as McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) now offer healthier options.

Most remain private for now, but as more of these firms launch IPO’s, investors will have several healthy fast-food restaurants from which to choose. Wall Street expects Chipotle to increase profits by an average of 24% per year for the next five years. For this reason, I expect a more gradual drop in the P/E ratio. However, over time I think CMG stock will eventually fall to a P/E ratio comparable to that of McDonald’s. Since that trend has already begun, I would recommend avoiding CMG stock at these levels.


Compare Brokers
High Multiples and Lack of Moat Make Godaddy Inc (GDDY) a Stock to AvoidHigh Multiples and Lack of Moat Make Godaddy Inc (GDDY) a Stock to AvoidSource: Shutterstock

GoDaddy (GDDY)

The public may know GoDaddy (NYSE:GDDY) best for Super Bowl commercials. However, it earns revenue as a domain registrar and web hosting service. Despite its thin-moat business, it has managed to acquire 18 million customers and hold 77 million domain names under management. This strategy has helped GDDY stock grow to a P/E ratio of 164 and will bring a 73.3% profit increase this year if Wall Street’s forecasts come to fruition.

However, I think the weak moat makes profit forecasts untrustworthy. The problem for GDDY is that consumers who want to register a domain or find web hosting have numerous companies from which to choose. Hence, the Super Bowl commercials and the GoDaddy name constitute its entire moat. Moreover, Danica Patrick’s retirement from racing has reduced the exposure she brought to the company. If people start to remember that other hosting companies exist, it could lead to a lower market share and reduced profit growth.

Despite the problems, I think highly of GoDaddy as a company. Achieving this level of earnings growth in a business with almost no moat stands as an impressive feat. However, I think that weak moat means GDDY stock will not stay on the most expensive stocks list for much longer.


Compare Brokers
Ionis Pharmaceuticals (IONS)Ionis Pharmaceuticals (IONS)Source: Shutterstock

Ionis Pharmaceuticals (IONS)

Ionis (NASDAQ:IONS) specializes in antisense technology. This allows for the manipulation of genes to treat diseases. The company is best known for the drug Spinraza, a therapy which it developed with Biogen (NASDAQ:BIIB) for spinal muscular atrophy. Ionis also leads the way in RNA therapies.

Where it cannot seem to lead the way is in stock price growth. IONS stock trades at around $70 per share. This takes it to a record high, but it also means it could form a double-top as it slightly exceeds the record levels in 2015. Moreover, the spike in profits in 2018 occurred from a one-time, $292 million tax event in the fourth quarter. Without such events, the forward P/E ratio rises to just above 201.

Analysts predict an average profit growth rate of 40% per year for the next five years. However, with drops in earnings coming for both this year and next, one has to wonder whether that forecast will hold. Even if IONS stock makes or exceeds that profit growth, whether it justifies its high multiple remains in question. While I expect Ionis to develop innovative therapies, measuring how much they succeed remains difficult. Between the possible double top in the charts, a 201 forward P/E and an uncertain future, I find it difficult to stay optimistic about the near-term prospects of IONS stock.


Compare Brokers
netflix stocknetflix stockSource: Vivian D Nguyen via Flickr (Modified)

Netflix (NFLX)

As the pioneer in streaming video, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) stock has remained a growth powerhouse for many years. Triple-digit P/E ratios and threats from competing streaming services have failed to stop the growth in NFLX stock. Over the last few years, Netflix has maintained this growth by developing award-winning, popular content and partnering with the likes of Disney (NYSE:DIS) to offer a wide variety of viewing choices.

However, Disney now plans to offer its own streaming service. With that, much of its popular content switches from a company asset to a competitive threat. Moreover, the high costs of in-house content development have increased the debt load on Netflix’s balance sheet. Netflix has increased fees to mitigate that cost. However, with Disney charging only $4.95 for its ESPN+ streaming services, they could choose to undercut Netflix and diminish the company’s ability to increase fees.

Granted, streaming services are a bargain compared to the traditional pay TV services. For this reason, rising prices may not lead to revenue declines. Still, in a world with many peers, maintaining the high multiple of NFLX stock could become difficult. Moreover, the forward P/E ratio, which now stands at just under 55, has fallen in recent years. This could trigger further stock dilution as Netflix needs options to pay down its debt. I expect Netflix to remain a content powerhouse for years to come, but with rising debts and increased competition, NFLX will probably not stay on the list of most expensive stocks.


Compare Brokers
Shopify Stock Could Be on Its Way to Making New HighsShopify Stock Could Be on Its Way to Making New HighsSource: Shopify via Flickr

Shopify (SHOP)

I have often referred to Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) stock as the “anti-Amazon,” the company that allows one to set up shop without the help of online giant Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Shopify’s platform allows any entrepreneur to build and operate an online store with minimal development skills. Given that reality, one can see why it earned its place on many most expensive stocks lists.

Since it trades at over 18 times sales and almost ten times book value, most would call SHOP stock pricey. Moreover, factors have emerged that would call these multiples as well as its 216.9 forward P/E ratio into question. Competitors such as WooCommerce and Magento, a product owned by Adobe (NASDAQ:ADBE) offer credible alternative platforms to online entrepreneurs. Amazon and Square (NYSE:SQ) have also targeted its customer base.

Wall Street expects average earnings increases of 56.3% per year over the next five years. Also, all e-commerce platform developers should benefit from the massive growth the industry will enjoy for the foreseeable future. However, Shopify has yet to turn an annual profit. With all of the available alternatives, more investors will probably question the current valuation of SHOP stock.


Compare Brokers
Twilio Stock Has Become More Pie in the Sky Than CloudTwilio Stock Has Become More Pie in the Sky Than CloudSource: Web Summit Via Flickr

Twilio (TWLO)

Twilio (NYSE:TWLO) has earned its designation among the most expensive stocks with its forward P/E ratio of almost 430. TWLO dominates the platform-as-a-service (PaaS) for cloud-based APIs. In layman’s terms, this is the technology that enables firms such as Uber to operate their services.

Although analysts foresee profits falling this year, they believe earnings will grow by an average 36.5% per year over the next five years. I think this rate of increase deserves a higher-than-average multiple. However, this growth rate still cannot possibly justify a 430 forward P/E multiple.

Moreover, competition has become an increasing threat as smaller competitors have emerged. TWLO stock fell recently when news came out that Uber was looking to reduce its dependence on Twilio. The stock could also drop precipitously if companies such as Amazon (who serves as Twilio’s hosting company) or Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL) decide to enter this market.

No matter the size of Twilio’s direct peers, competition will pose an increasing threat. I expect this industry to see massive growth over the next few years. However, even exponential growth has its limits. With its 400-plus forward P/E and new competitors emerging, I think TWLO stock has nowhere to go but down.

As of this writing, Will Healy did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned stocks. You can follow Will on Twitter

Thursday, March 7, 2019

ValuEngine Upgrades Zynerba Pharmaceuticals (ZYNE) to “Hold”

Zynerba Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ZYNE) was upgraded by ValuEngine from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report issued on Tuesday.

Several other research analysts have also weighed in on the company. Cantor Fitzgerald set a $21.00 price target on Zynerba Pharmaceuticals and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, December 17th. HC Wainwright set a $23.00 price target on Zynerba Pharmaceuticals and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Tuesday, November 13th. Finally, Zacks Investment Research raised Zynerba Pharmaceuticals from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $4.50 price target on the stock in a research report on Saturday, January 19th. Three equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and four have issued a buy rating to the stock. The stock presently has an average rating of “Buy” and an average target price of $15.88.

Get Zynerba Pharmaceuticals alerts:

Shares of NASDAQ:ZYNE traded down $0.10 during trading on Tuesday, hitting $4.97. 505,900 shares of the company were exchanged, compared to its average volume of 1,093,233. The firm has a market capitalization of $89.38 million, a price-to-earnings ratio of -2.00 and a beta of 4.98. Zynerba Pharmaceuticals has a fifty-two week low of $2.75 and a fifty-two week high of $12.50.

Hedge funds have recently bought and sold shares of the stock. Virtu Financial LLC acquired a new position in shares of Zynerba Pharmaceuticals during the 4th quarter worth approximately $40,000. Two Sigma Investments LP acquired a new position in shares of Zynerba Pharmaceuticals during the 4th quarter worth approximately $120,000. Thompson Siegel & Walmsley LLC acquired a new position in shares of Zynerba Pharmaceuticals during the 3rd quarter worth approximately $157,000. GSA Capital Partners LLP acquired a new position in shares of Zynerba Pharmaceuticals during the 3rd quarter worth approximately $177,000. Finally, Zeke Capital Advisors LLC acquired a new position in shares of Zynerba Pharmaceuticals during the 3rd quarter worth approximately $193,000. 16.40% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.

About Zynerba Pharmaceuticals

Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc operates as a clinical stage specialty pharmaceutical company. The company focuses on developing and commercializing pharmaceutically-produced transdermal cannabinoid treatments for rare or near-rare neuropsychiatric disorders. Its product candidates include ZYN002, which completed Phase II clinical trial for pediatric and adolescent patients with fragile X syndrome, pediatric and adolescent patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, and adult patients with refractory epileptic focal seizures; and ZYN001 that is in Phase I clinical trial to treat Tourette syndrome.

Featured Story: Blue-Chip Stocks

To view ValuEngine’s full report, visit ValuEngine’s official website.

Analyst Recommendations for Zynerba Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ZYNE)